Back to Resources

Gutenberg vs. Elementor: Choosing the Right Tool in 2026

Is the native Block Editor finally ready for complex agency sites? A tactical comparison.

February 07, 2026 Technical Strategy

The WordPress community is divided. Purists say "Gutenberg is the future." Agencies say "Elementor is faster to build with." Who is right?

Elementor: The Visual Powerhouse

Elementor remains the king of "Visual Freedom."

  • Pros: Insanely fast prototyping. Complex animations without code. Huge ecosystem.
  • Cons: Heavy DOM, potential performance impact (if not optimized), recurring license costs.
  • Best for: Marketing landing pages, sites with complex, non-standard layouts, clients who need drag-and-drop freedom.

Gutenberg (Block Editor): The Native Way

Gutenberg ensures you are using WordPress "as intended."

  • Pros: Zero bloat (native HTML). Future-proof. Extremely fast on frontend.
  • Cons: The editing experience can be clunky. Customizing complex layouts often requires React development or a framework like GenerateBlocks/Bricks.
  • Best for: Editorial content, long-term corporate sites, performance-critical projects.

The Hybrid Approach (My Strategy)

I often recommend a hybrid approach for agencies:

Use a Performance Builder (like Bricks) for the Header, Footer, and Page Templates. Use Gutenberg for the Post Content (Blog articles, Case Studies).

This gives you the structural power of a builder but keeps your written content portable and clean. If you ever change themes in 5 years, your blog posts remain intact.

Confused about the Tech Stack?

I advise agencies on the right tooling for their specific niche.

Book a Strategy Call